Publications by tag "Web of Science"

Obtaining indexation in an international database is far more difficult than losing it. Practically every month, Scopus and Web of Science exclude journals from their lists that breach established standards. Why does this happen? What exactly can cause a journal to be stripped of its indexation in an international database? Read on.

Peer review is a key stage of the publication process, since it determines the further fate of an article. This is why every author must have a thorough understanding of the particularities of manuscript evaluation. What types of peer review exist? What are the differences between them? Read on.

More and more scientists are using artificial intelligence when preparing scientific articles – from finding the right wording to analysing the literature. But does the journal’s editorial board need to be told about this, and where is the line between acceptable help and a breach of academic ethics? We cover all of this in today’s video.

In an exclusive article for the author's column, Vladislav Romanenko, Director of the Scientific Publications company, spoke in detail about the goals that Bulgarian science sets for itself within the framework of this strategic document, the mechanisms envisaged for their achievement, and the challenges that the scientific community may face.

A mistake at the journal-selection stage can significantly reduce the visibility of your article. Moreover, submitting a manuscript to an irrelevant publication often results in its rejection and prolongs the publication timeline. How can this be avoided? Read on to find out.

For an article to successfully pass peer review, it is not enough for its topic to match the thematic profile of a scientific journal. Equally important is compliance with all the technical nuances of structuring and formatting the manuscript. How can an article be properly adapted to the requirements of a specific scientific journal? Why is this one of the key stages of working on a study? Read on.