Publications by tag "Scopus"

A mistake at the journal-selection stage can significantly reduce the visibility of your article. Moreover, submitting a manuscript to an irrelevant publication often results in its rejection and prolongs the publication timeline. How can this be avoided? Read on to find out.

For an article to successfully pass peer review, it is not enough for its topic to match the thematic profile of a scientific journal. Equally important is compliance with all the technical nuances of structuring and formatting the manuscript. How can an article be properly adapted to the requirements of a specific scientific journal? Why is this one of the key stages of working on a study? Read on.

Vladislav Romanenko, director of the Scientific Publications company, has prepared an exclusive article in which he explains in detail why it is important for a scientist to analyse not only their own indicators but also the results of other researchers, as well as how the Top-1000 scientists of Bulgaria ranking is formed.

Predatory journals pose a serious threat to researchers, as publishing in them can damage an author's reputation. What forms do they take? How can you tell you're dealing with a disreputable journal? Read on to find out.

Conference proceedings or journals indexed in the Scopus database – which is the better choice for publication? Vladyslav Romanenko, Director of the Scientific Publications company, explains in detail how to avoid making the wrong decision.

In the academic community, there is a practice of withdrawing scientific articles that have already been published. This procedure is known as retraction and is applied when significant issues are identified after publication that call into question the reliability or integrity of the research. What reasons can lead to a retraction? What types of retractions exist, and how do they affect a researcher's reputation? Let us examine these issues in more detail.